<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Case You Care: Technorati Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/</link>
	<description>Business Development, Marketing, Common Sense &#038; Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:46:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-139749</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/#comment-139749</guid>
		<description>&quot;Relevant&quot; - ah, that&#039;s the trick, isn&#039;t it? How would they do this?  How can they transition from a rather snarky popularity ranking system to something of intrinsic value?  Hmmm.....

Yes, I&#039;m still &quot;tagging&quot; but am dropping - I&#039;m so over Technorati. Dont&#039; see the value for me or my readers, given how wonky their tracking/ranking system is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Relevant&#8221; &#8211; ah, that&#8217;s the trick, isn&#8217;t it? How would they do this?  How can they transition from a rather snarky popularity ranking system to something of intrinsic value?  Hmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m still &#8220;tagging&#8221; but am dropping &#8211; I&#8217;m so over Technorati. Dont&#8217; see the value for me or my readers, given how wonky their tracking/ranking system is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gerbyshak</title>
		<link>http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-139747</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gerbyshak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maryschmidt.com/2007/10/06/in-case-you-care-technorati-changes/#comment-139747</guid>
		<description>My thought on why one would buy Technorati: All the juice it gets from folks linking back to it with it&#039;s tags means (if it were properly monetized) it could be the #1 spot for links back on all things blog, a big deal in the land of findability. Of course, it would have to write some of it&#039;s own content that folks link back to, and find a way to remain relevant and KEEP people linking back to them, but old habits die hard. Look at how many bloggers still use Technorati tags in their posts, and how many software programs have built in Technorati tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought on why one would buy Technorati: All the juice it gets from folks linking back to it with it&#8217;s tags means (if it were properly monetized) it could be the #1 spot for links back on all things blog, a big deal in the land of findability. Of course, it would have to write some of it&#8217;s own content that folks link back to, and find a way to remain relevant and KEEP people linking back to them, but old habits die hard. Look at how many bloggers still use Technorati tags in their posts, and how many software programs have built in Technorati tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
